lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8bc40c78-9d5a-ea23-586a-5cf38845bfaf@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 4 Sep 2023 09:40:07 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Jianmin Lv <lvjianmin@...ngson.cn>,
        Binbin Zhou <zhoubb.aaron@...il.com>,
        Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
Cc:     Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
        Binbin Zhou <zhoubinbin@...ngson.cn>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        loongson-kernel@...ts.loongnix.cn, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, diasyzhang@...cent.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: loongson,liointc:
 Fix warnings about liointc-2.0

On 02/09/2023 08:32, Jianmin Lv wrote:
> Each IRQ source of liointc may be routed to different IRQ source of 
> cpuintc, for implementing this, bit mapping between liointc and cpuintc 
> is required, and the mapping information is used for liointc IRQ routing 
> register setting. It seems that interrupt-map can not pass the mapping 
> to driver in current driver/of code,  so the mapping is used in a 
> non-standard way(of cause, underscore style may be changed in dts and 
> driver).
> 
> IMO, hardcode routing completely in driver is not flexible and not 

"not recommended" by whom?

> recommended, and if possible, keep current map unchanged please.
> 

You could have proposed that time, when review was happening. The
property was added AFTER review, so the review was invalidated.

Drop the property and use interrupt-map. Eventually change it to
something acceptable which will PASS review, not bypass it.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ