[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8bc40c78-9d5a-ea23-586a-5cf38845bfaf@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2023 09:40:07 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Jianmin Lv <lvjianmin@...ngson.cn>,
Binbin Zhou <zhoubb.aaron@...il.com>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Binbin Zhou <zhoubinbin@...ngson.cn>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
loongson-kernel@...ts.loongnix.cn, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, diasyzhang@...cent.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: loongson,liointc:
Fix warnings about liointc-2.0
On 02/09/2023 08:32, Jianmin Lv wrote:
> Each IRQ source of liointc may be routed to different IRQ source of
> cpuintc, for implementing this, bit mapping between liointc and cpuintc
> is required, and the mapping information is used for liointc IRQ routing
> register setting. It seems that interrupt-map can not pass the mapping
> to driver in current driver/of code, so the mapping is used in a
> non-standard way(of cause, underscore style may be changed in dts and
> driver).
>
> IMO, hardcode routing completely in driver is not flexible and not
"not recommended" by whom?
> recommended, and if possible, keep current map unchanged please.
>
You could have proposed that time, when review was happening. The
property was added AFTER review, so the review was invalidated.
Drop the property and use interrupt-map. Eventually change it to
something acceptable which will PASS review, not bypass it.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists