[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ddbc2681-bbda-88a1-643c-54fcabc9b83a@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2023 12:36:00 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Macpaul Lin <macpaul.lin@...iatek.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>,
Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@...libre.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Bear Wang <bear.wang@...iatek.com>,
Pablo Sun <pablo.sun@...iatek.com>,
Macpaul Lin <macpaul@...il.com>,
Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm64: dts: mediatek: Add mt8395-evk
board
On 05/09/2023 11:36, Macpaul Lin wrote:
>
>
> On 9/4/23 20:11, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>
>>
>> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until you
>> have verified the sender or the content.
>>
>> On 04/09/2023 11:50, Macpaul Lin wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/4/23 17:33, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until you
>>>> have verified the sender or the content.
>>>>
>>>> On 04/09/2023 11:20, Macpaul Lin wrote:
>>>>> Add bindings for the MediaTek mt8395-evk board.
>>>>> The mt8359-evk board is also named as "Genio 1200-EVK".
>>>>> MT8195 and MT8395 are the same family series SoC could share
>>>>
>>>> How can be the same and have different numbers? You sill need dedicated
>>>> compatible.
>>>>
>>>
>>> The SoCs mt8195 and mt8395 are designed for different market application
>>> and physical characteristics, using different efuse values for
>>> distinction. The booting flow and configurations are controllered by the
>>> boot loaders, firmware, and TF-A. Therefore, the part numbers and
>>> procurement channels are different. The detail information of these
>>> efuse values is proprietary, so I cant disclose it futher. Hence the
>>> most of peripheral drivers and base address are almost the same.
>>
>> 1. Drivers? So we talk about compatibility, not the same.
>> 2. "almost the same" is not the same. Follow the guidelines for writing
>> bindings.
>>
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> After internal confirmation and discussion, it can be confirmed that the
> MT8195 and MT8395 are identical SoCs from to binding's perspective.
I am sorry, but I really do not care what you internally discussed about
bindings. I do not think your internal review respect existing
guidelines. You talked about drivers, not "bindings perspective", so
your internal discussion is clearly discussing something else.
> MediaTek hope the mt8395 boards could directly use mt8195.dtsi, without
> the need to create a separate mt8395.dtsi to include mt8195.dtsi.
> Therefore, we hope to fully adopt the bindings of mt8195. However, I
> will submit a revised patch for compatible since they are different boards.
You can disagree but then I expect arguments from your side.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists