linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] x86/clear_huge

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 05 Sep 2023 12:36:09 -0700
From:   Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>
To:     Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@....com>
Cc:     Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, luto@...nel.org, bp@...en8.de,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
        juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
        willy@...radead.org, mgorman@...e.de, peterz@...radead.org,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, tglx@...utronix.de, jon.grimm@....com,
        bharata@....com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] x86/clear_huge_page: multi-page clearing


Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@....com> writes:

> On 8/31/2023 12:19 AM, Ankur Arora wrote:
>> This series adds a multi-page clearing primitive, clear_pages(),
>> which enables more effective use of x86 string instructions by
>> advertising the real region-size to be cleared.
>> Region-size can be used as a hint by uarchs to optimize the
>> clearing.
>> Also add allow_resched() which marks a code-section as allowing
>> rescheduling in the irqentry_exit path. This allows clear_pages()
>> to get by without having to call cond_sched() periodically.
>> (preempt_model_full() already handles this via
>> irqentry_exit_cond_resched(), so we handle this similarly for
>> preempt_model_none() and preempt_model_voluntary().)
>>
>
> Hello Ankur,
> Thansk for the patches.
>
> I tried the patches, Improvements look similar to V1 (even without
> circuitous chunk optimizations.)

Thanks for testing Raghu.

> STill we see similar 50-60% improvement for 1G and 2M page sizes.
>
> SUT: Bergamo
>     CPU family:          25
>     Model:               160
>     Thread(s) per core:  2
>     Core(s) per socket:  128
>     Socket(s):           2
>
> NUMA:
>   NUMA node(s):          2
>   NUMA node0 CPU(s):     0-127,256-383
>   NUMA node1 CPU(s):     128-255,384-511
>
> Test:  Use mmap(MAP_HUGETLB) to demand a fault on 64GB region (NUMA node0), for
> both base-hugepage-size=2M and 1GB
> Current result is with thp = always, but madv also did not make much difference.
> perf stat -r 10 -d -d  numactl -m 0 -N 0 <test>
>
> time in seconds elapsed (average of 10 runs) (lower = better)
>
> Result:
> base: mm/clear_huge_page
> patched: x86/clear_huge_page
>
> page-size  base       patched     Improvement %
> 2M         5.0779     2.50623     50.64
> 1G         2.50623    1.012439    59.60

Seems like Bergamo improves over Milan for both 4K BW, and also
for extent=2MB/extent=1GB.

> Please feel free to carry:
>
> Tested-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@....com>
> for any minor changes.

Thank you. Will add.

--
ankur