[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a371b120-5536-1054-7f09-957b427e46ff@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2023 10:08:28 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Hongchen Zhang <zhanghongchen@...ngson.cn>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Mike Rapoport IBM)" <rppt@...nel.org>,
Feiyang Chen <chenfeiyang@...ngson.cn>,
Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
Cc: loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
loongson-kernel@...ts.loongnix.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: add p?d_leaf() definitions
On 06.09.23 10:06, Hongchen Zhang wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On 2023/9/6 pm 3:42, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 05.09.23 08:49, Hongchen Zhang wrote:
>>> When I do LTP test, LTP test case ksm06 caused panic at
>>> break_ksm_pmd_entry
>>> -> pmd_leaf (Huge page table but False)
>>> -> pte_present (panic)
>>>
>>
>> Probably there are other problematic bits without that can trigger that?
>> I suspect walk_page_range*() callers might be affected,
> I rechecked the code and found that other architectures that support
> THP have defined pmd_leaf.
> So there is not problem on other architectures.
I meant other walk_page_range*() callers on loongarch might similarly be
affected. IOW, KSM might not be the only bit being able to trigger such
panics on loongarch.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists