[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8197d5c6-bd05-ff16-59d5-ba3eb06a5921@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2023 14:05:58 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550-mtp: use correct UFS supply
On 06/09/2023 13:50, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 6.09.2023 13:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 06/09/2023 13:28, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> On 6.09.2023 12:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> According to schematics the VCCQ2 supply is not connected and the L3G
>>>> regulator instead powers up the controller pads (VDD_PX10). Use correct
>>>> supply vdd-hba and drop unsupported current limit for the vdd-hba.
>>> Why is it unsupported?
>>
>> Maybe I was here not precise. I move the regulator from vccq2 to
>> vdd-hba. vccq2 has control of current in UFS core driver. Bindings also
>> allow it.
> Looks like the bindings are out of sync with the driver.
>
> ufshcd_populate_vreg() which parses current is used for both vccq2
> and vdd-hba.
Just for convenience. The current is not used for vdd-hba. Also:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230906113302.201888-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists