[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <000001d9e068$84cabcc0$8e603640$@samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2023 11:19:08 +0900
From: "Kwanghoon Son" <k.son@...sung.com>
To: "'Krzysztof Kozlowski'" <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
<p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
<jszhang@...nel.org>, <guoren@...nel.org>, <wefu@...hat.com>,
<paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, <palmer@...belt.com>,
<aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, <inki.dae@...sung.com>
Cc: <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH 2/3] reset: Add th1520 reset driver support
> > drivers/reset/Kconfig | 10 +++
> > drivers/reset/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/reset/reset-th1520.c | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/dt-bindings/reset/th1520-reset.h | 9 ++
>
> Bindings are always separate patches. In this case, all bindings should
> be together. Also you clearly forgot one step:
Thanks for the feedback. Does it mean 2 files
`include/dt-bindings/reset/th1520-reset.h`, `Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/thead,th1520-reset.yaml`
Should be one patch first together?
Kwnag.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists