[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM9d7chkvhnfhZo+Whypg40Vik3XiuvbKWZ_3jF0Zpsj+6JfqA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2023 14:32:22 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Aditya Gupta <adityag@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, irogers@...gle.com,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, maddy@...ux.ibm.com,
atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, kjain@...ux.ibm.com,
disgoel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] perf tests task_analyzer: use perf check for
libtraceevent support
On Sun, Sep 3, 2023 at 4:47 AM Aditya Gupta <adityag@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Currently we use output of 'perf version --build-options', to check whether
> perf was built with libtraceevent support.
>
> Instead, use 'perf check --feature libtraceevent' to check for
> libtraceevent support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aditya Gupta <adityag@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/tests/shell/test_task_analyzer.sh | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_task_analyzer.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_task_analyzer.sh
> index 92d15154ba79..8fbc33c95025 100755
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_task_analyzer.sh
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_task_analyzer.sh
> @@ -52,8 +52,8 @@ find_str_or_fail() {
>
> # check if perf is compiled with libtraceevent support
> skip_no_probe_record_support() {
> - perf version --build-options | grep -q " OFF .* HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT" && return 2
> - return 0
> + perf check --feature libtraceevent >/dev/null && return 0
Maybe we can add -q/--quiet option to silent messages.
Thanks,
Namhyung
> + return 2
> }
>
> prepare_perf_data() {
> --
> 2.41.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists