lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM9d7chkvhnfhZo+Whypg40Vik3XiuvbKWZ_3jF0Zpsj+6JfqA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 7 Sep 2023 14:32:22 -0700
From:   Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:     Aditya Gupta <adityag@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, irogers@...gle.com,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, maddy@...ux.ibm.com,
        atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, kjain@...ux.ibm.com,
        disgoel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] perf tests task_analyzer: use perf check for
 libtraceevent support

On Sun, Sep 3, 2023 at 4:47 AM Aditya Gupta <adityag@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Currently we use output of 'perf version --build-options', to check whether
> perf was built with libtraceevent support.
>
> Instead, use 'perf check --feature libtraceevent' to check for
> libtraceevent support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aditya Gupta <adityag@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/tests/shell/test_task_analyzer.sh | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_task_analyzer.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_task_analyzer.sh
> index 92d15154ba79..8fbc33c95025 100755
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_task_analyzer.sh
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_task_analyzer.sh
> @@ -52,8 +52,8 @@ find_str_or_fail() {
>
>  # check if perf is compiled with libtraceevent support
>  skip_no_probe_record_support() {
> -       perf version --build-options | grep -q " OFF .* HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT" && return 2
> -       return 0
> +       perf check --feature libtraceevent >/dev/null && return 0

Maybe we can add -q/--quiet option to silent messages.

Thanks,
Namhyung


> +       return 2
>  }
>
>  prepare_perf_data() {
> --
> 2.41.0
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ