[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <kondzija2p2qdahlqib5mmmfda2ecogyhrpj7r7cyskj7vm6kb@4q6c7akd3kgz>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 11:16:09 +0530
From: Aditya Gupta <adityag@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, irogers@...gle.com,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, maddy@...ux.ibm.com,
atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, kjain@...ux.ibm.com,
disgoel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] perf tests task_analyzer: use perf check for
libtraceevent support
Hi Namhyung,
Sorry for the late reply.
On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 02:32:22PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 3, 2023 at 4:47 AM Aditya Gupta <adityag@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > Currently we use output of 'perf version --build-options', to check whether
> > perf was built with libtraceevent support.
> >
> > Instead, use 'perf check --feature libtraceevent' to check for
> > libtraceevent support.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Aditya Gupta <adityag@...ux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/tests/shell/test_task_analyzer.sh | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_task_analyzer.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_task_analyzer.sh
> > index 92d15154ba79..8fbc33c95025 100755
> > --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_task_analyzer.sh
> > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_task_analyzer.sh
> > @@ -52,8 +52,8 @@ find_str_or_fail() {
> >
> > # check if perf is compiled with libtraceevent support
> > skip_no_probe_record_support() {
> > - perf version --build-options | grep -q " OFF .* HAVE_LIBTRACEEVENT" && return 2
> > - return 0
> > + perf check --feature libtraceevent >/dev/null && return 0
>
> Maybe we can add -q/--quiet option to silent messages.
Nice idea, thanks. Will do so.
Thanks
- Aditya Gupta
Powered by blists - more mailing lists