[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJve8om+dLcG+4trDfG1yx8vhj52RhPZrJoF-emWDX+OPM088A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2023 11:57:00 +0800
From: Haibo Xu <xiaobo55x@...il.com>
To: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
Cc: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@...el.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@...tanamicro.com>,
wchen <waylingii@...il.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@...gle.com>,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@...gle.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@...gle.com>,
Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@...gle.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Lei Wang <lei4.wang@...el.com>,
Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@...gle.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>,
Like Xu <likexu@...cent.com>, Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>,
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@...aro.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
Michal Luczaj <mhal@...x.co>, Paul Durrant <paul@....org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] KVM: riscv: selftest: Change vcpu_has_ext to a
common function
On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 6:10 PM Haibo Xu <xiaobo55x@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 10:04 PM Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 08:59:29PM +0800, Haibo Xu wrote:
> > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c
> > > index d8ecacd03ecf..c4028bf32e3f 100644
> > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c
> > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c
> > > @@ -44,20 +44,6 @@ bool check_reject_set(int err)
> > > return err == EINVAL;
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static inline bool vcpu_has_ext(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int ext)
> > > -{
> > > - int ret;
> > > - unsigned long value;
> > > -
> > > - ret = __vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, RISCV_ISA_EXT_REG(ext), &value);
> > > - if (ret) {
> > > - printf("Failed to get ext %d", ext);
> > > - return false;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - return !!value;
> >
> > get-reg-list will now assert on get-reg when an extension isn't present,
> > rather than failing the __TEST_REQUIRE(), which would do a skip instead.
> > We need both the return false version and the assert version.
> >
>
> Ok, Will keep this one for get-reg-list and add another one for
> arch-timer specific usage.
>
Just thought about it again, maybe we only need the "return false"
version for both get-reg-list
and arch-timer tests since if an extension was not available, the test
can be skipped with a message.
bool vcpu_has_ext(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int ext)
{
unsigned long value = 0;
__vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, RISCV_ISA_EXT_REG(ext), &value);
return !!value;
}
> > > -}
> > > -
> > > void finalize_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
> > > {
> > > struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s;
> > > --
> > > 2.34.1
> > >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > drew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists