[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZPnJDTcKb5Wf30Zl@Gentoo>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2023 18:28:53 +0530
From: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: workflows@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jesper.juhl@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Process: Add a note about git way of
applying patch
On 06:48 Thu 07 Sep 2023, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com> writes:
>
>> cc: jesper.juhl@...il.com
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/process/applying-patches.rst | 7 +++++++
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/process/applying-patches.rst b/Documentation/process/applying-patches.rst
>> index c269f5e1a0a3..201b9900bffe 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/process/applying-patches.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/process/applying-patches.rst
>> @@ -6,6 +6,13 @@ Applying Patches To The Linux Kernel
>> Original by:
>> Jesper Juhl, August 2005
>>
>> +
>> +.. applying patch by Git::
>> +
>> + You can use the below syntax to patch in git repository
>> + git-apply --whitespace=error-all <patchfile>
>> +
>> +
>> .. note::
>>
>> This document is obsolete. In most cases, rather than using ``patch``
>
>So why are you sending a patch ... with no changelog
My bad. Realized it once send it.
>to a document that is explicitly marked as being obsolete?
I thought if people visit that page , that note might help.
Are we taking out that page from the doc? Why that page is still there?
>jon
--
Thanks,
Bhaskar
"Here's looking at you kid"-- Casablanca
https://about.me/unixbhaskar
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists