[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM9d7cij=Ph_esnEwDVSRYZRi9i_GOgRfa7rK_DjihX1rnk_HA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2023 09:33:58 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: "Wang, Weilin" <weilin.wang@...el.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
"Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
"linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org" <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
"Alt, Samantha" <samantha.alt@...el.com>,
"Taylor, Perry" <perry.taylor@...el.com>,
"Biggers, Caleb" <caleb.biggers@...el.com>,
"ravi.bangoria@....com" <ravi.bangoria@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Add metric value validation test
On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 9:58 PM Wang, Weilin <weilin.wang@...el.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Namhyung,
>
> The report shows there are four metrics return with no values. Do you know which processor this was tested on?
It's a laptop with 11th gen CPUs (tigerlake).
$ head /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 140
model name : 11th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-1185G7 @ 3.00GHz
stepping : 1
microcode : 0xac
cpu MHz : 3899.531
cache size : 12288 KB
physical id : 0
>
> I can look into the test and see if I could improve the final report to make it easier to debug when fails.
Thanks,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists