[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f872ed00-f474-b217-ed78-8612242d448b@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2023 14:49:10 +0200
From: Philipp Hortmann <philipp.g.hortmann@...il.com>
To: Pavan Bobba <opensource206@...il.com>,
Forest Bond <forest@...ttletooquiet.net>,
Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com>
Cc: linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: vt6655: array names updated as per kernel
coding guidelines
On 9/7/23 14:23, Pavan Bobba wrote:
> Below array names updated as per coding guidelines:
>
> 1.byVT3253B0_AGC4_RFMD2959
> 2.byVT3253B0_AIROHA2230
> 3.byVT3253B0_UW2451
> 4.byVT3253B0_AGC
>
> Conversions performed:
> a.type encoding info dropped from names
> b.names replaced by snakecase
>
> Issue found by checkpatch
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavan Bobba<opensource206@...il.com>
> ---
> v1 -> v2: 1.subject name modified to more meaningful detail
> 2.name of the tool added in body of explanation,
> which found this issue
Hi Pavan,
you did not fullfil what Greg wrote:
- You did not write a descriptive Subject: for the patch, allowing Greg,
and everyone else, to know what this patch is all about. Please read
the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file,
Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what a proper
Subject: line should look like.
The issue is that hundreds of patches could have this title: "array
names updated as per kernel coding guidelines" Make it more unique.
Rename CamelCase variable starting with byVT3253B0_
Always consider that Greg reads a lot of patches per day.
Bye Philipp
Powered by blists - more mailing lists