linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: arm64: dts: mediatek: add mt8395-evk board

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 11 Sep 2023 09:03:39 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Macpaul Lin <macpaul.lin@...iatek.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
        Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@...libre.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     Bear Wang <bear.wang@...iatek.com>,
        Pablo Sun <pablo.sun@...iatek.com>,
        Macpaul Lin <macpaul@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: arm64: dts: mediatek: add mt8395-evk
 board

On 11/09/2023 08:46, Macpaul Lin wrote:
> On 9/11/23 14:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> 	
>>
>> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until you 
>> have verified the sender or the content.
>>
>> On 10/09/2023 14:23, Macpaul Lin wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/10/23 18:56, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> External email : Please do nost click links or open attachments until you 
>>>> have verified the sender or the content.
>>>>
>>>> On 09/09/2023 15:28, Macpaul Lin wrote:
>>>>> 1. Add compatible for MT8395.
>>>>> 2. Add bindings for the MediaTek mt8395-evk board, also known
>>>>> as the "Genio 1200-EVK".
>>>>>
>>>>> The MT8195 and MT8395 belong to the same SoC family,
>>>>> with only minor differences in their physical characteristics.
>>>>> They utilize unique efuse values for differentiation.
>>>>>
>>>>> The booting process and configurations are managed by boot
>>>>> loaders, firmware, and TF-A. Consequently, the part numbers
>>>>> and procurement channels vary.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Macpaul Lin <macpaul.lin@...iatek.com>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
>>>
>>> Changes for v4:
>>> Changes for v5:
>>>   - No change, update Reviewed-by tag only. Thanks.
>>>
>>> The explanation is here. The version v4 and v5 are the same.
>>> For sending v5 is because "Patch v5 2/2" has been updated and these 2 
>>> patches were in the same patch set. I think to update the whole patch 
>>> set together with a single modified patch should be a usual operation.
>>> Did I miss anything?
>>
>> Yeah, like not top-posting.
>>
>> Why do you change the same line in other patchset?
> 
> Hmm, they are different patch actually.

That's what I wrote. "Other patchset" == "different patch".

> I've tested the patch v5 here can be applied with / without mt8365's 
> description patch independently.

That's not the answer to my question. I asked "Why". I have troubles
getting any answers here, so let's be clear - this or the other patch is
just wrong.

Best regards,
Krzysztof