[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <169444319926.1226593.2342724672076403322.robh@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 09:40:00 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
Nikunj Kela <nkela@...cinc.com>,
Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@...cinc.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/13] dt-bindings: power: Clarify performance
capabilities of power-domains
On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 13:26:30 +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> The power-domains bindings has in many years been used to describe so
> called performance-domains too. Rather than using a separate binding it has
> been convenient to re-use the power-domain bindings, as in some cases it's
> in fact a combination of the both that would be the best description.
>
> Therefore, let's make it more clear that the power-domains bindings can be
> used to describe a performance-domain too.
>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>
> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
> Cc: Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
> Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
> ---
>
> Changes in v3:
> - New patch.
>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml | 17 +++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists