[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e0fa9375-0b50-af89-81d3-eaaecf19a788@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 09:59:31 -0700
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: Wieczor-Retman Maciej <maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
CC: <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v3 2/2] selftests/resctrl: Move run_benchmark() to
a more fitting file
Hi Maciej,
On 9/1/2023 6:42 AM, Wieczor-Retman Maciej wrote:
> resctrlfs.c file contains mostly functions that interact in some way
This can just be "resctrlfs.c contains ..." (no need for "file")
> with resctrl FS entries while functions inside resctrl_val.c deal with
> measurements and benchmarking.
>
> run_benchmark() is located in resctrlfs.c file even though it's
same here
> purpose is not interacting with the resctrl FS but to execute cache
> checking logic.
>
> Move run_benchmark() to resctrl_val.c just before resctrl_val() that
> makes use of run_benchmark(). Make run_benchmark() static since it's
> not used between multiple files anymore.
>
> Remove return comment from kernel-doc since the function is type void.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wieczor-Retman Maciej <maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
Reinette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists