[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <99eabc5c-f5e3-27dd-0a29-ad0cdb7b4239@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 09:59:06 -0700
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: Wieczor-Retman Maciej <maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
CC: <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v3 1/2] selftests/resctrl: Fix schemata write error
check
Hi Maciej,
On 9/1/2023 6:42 AM, Wieczor-Retman Maciej wrote:
> Writing bitmasks to the schemata can fail when the bitmask doesn't
> adhere to constraints defined by what a particular CPU supports.
> Some example of constraints are max length or having contiguous bits.
> The driver should properly return errors when any rule concerning
> bitmask format is broken.
>
> Resctrl FS returns error codes from fprintf() only when fclose() is
> called. Current error checking scheme allows invalid bitmasks to be
> written into schemata file and the selftest doesn't notice because the
> fclose() error code isn't checked.
>
> Substitute fopen(), flose() and fprintf() with open(), close() and
> write() to avoid error code buffering between fprintf() and fclose().
>
> Remove newline character from the schema string after writing it to
> the schemata file so it prints correctly before function return.
>
> Pass the string generated with strerror() to the "reason" buffer so
> the error message is more verbose. Extend "reason" buffer so it can hold
> longer messages.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wieczor-Retman Maciej <maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>
When I build the tests with this applied I encounter the following:
resctrlfs.c: In function ‘write_schemata’:
resctrlfs.c:475:14: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘open’; did you mean ‘popen’? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
475 | fd = open(controlgroup, O_WRONLY);
| ^~~~
| popen
resctrlfs.c:475:33: error: ‘O_WRONLY’ undeclared (first use in this function)
475 | fd = open(controlgroup, O_WRONLY);
| ^~~~~~~~
resctrlfs.c:475:33: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> ---
> Changelog v3:
> - Rename fp to fd (Ilpo)
> - Remove strlen, strcspn and just use the snprintf value instead (Ilpo)
>
> Changelog v2:
> - Rewrite patch message.
> - Double "reason" buffer size to fit longer error explanation.
> - Redo file interactions with syscalls instead of stdio functions.
>
> tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c | 26 +++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
> index bd36ee206602..b0b14a5bcbf5 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
> @@ -488,9 +488,8 @@ int write_bm_pid_to_resctrl(pid_t bm_pid, char *ctrlgrp, char *mongrp,
> */
> int write_schemata(char *ctrlgrp, char *schemata, int cpu_no, char *resctrl_val)
> {
> - char controlgroup[1024], schema[1024], reason[64];
> - int resource_id, ret = 0;
> - FILE *fp;
> + char controlgroup[1024], schema[1024], reason[128];
> + int resource_id, fd, schema_len = -1, ret = 0;
>
> if (strncmp(resctrl_val, MBA_STR, sizeof(MBA_STR)) &&
> strncmp(resctrl_val, MBM_STR, sizeof(MBM_STR)) &&
> @@ -518,27 +517,30 @@ int write_schemata(char *ctrlgrp, char *schemata, int cpu_no, char *resctrl_val)
>
> if (!strncmp(resctrl_val, CAT_STR, sizeof(CAT_STR)) ||
> !strncmp(resctrl_val, CMT_STR, sizeof(CMT_STR)))
> - sprintf(schema, "%s%d%c%s", "L3:", resource_id, '=', schemata);
> + schema_len = snprintf(schema, sizeof(schema), "%s%d%c%s\n",
> + "L3:", resource_id, '=', schemata);
> if (!strncmp(resctrl_val, MBA_STR, sizeof(MBA_STR)) ||
> !strncmp(resctrl_val, MBM_STR, sizeof(MBM_STR)))
> - sprintf(schema, "%s%d%c%s", "MB:", resource_id, '=', schemata);
> + schema_len = snprintf(schema, sizeof(schema), "%s%d%c%s\n",
> + "MB:", resource_id, '=', schemata);
>
> - fp = fopen(controlgroup, "w");
> - if (!fp) {
> + fd = open(controlgroup, O_WRONLY);
> + if (!fd) {
> sprintf(reason, "Failed to open control group");
It makes code easier to understand and maintain if it is kept
consistent. It is thus unexpected for open() error handling to
be untouched while write() error handling is modified. I think
the addition of errno in error handling of write() is helpful.
Could you do the same for open()?
> ret = -1;
>
> goto out;
> }
> -
> - if (fprintf(fp, "%s\n", schema) < 0) {
> - sprintf(reason, "Failed to write schemata in control group");
> - fclose(fp);
> + if (write(fd, schema, schema_len) < 0) {
> + snprintf(reason, sizeof(reason),
> + "write() failed : %s", strerror(errno));
> + close(fd);
> ret = -1;
>
> goto out;
> }
> - fclose(fp);
> + close(fd);
> + schema[schema_len - 1] = 0;
>
> out:
> ksft_print_msg("Write schema \"%s\" to resctrl FS%s%s\n",
Reinette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists