[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUaXjDJ3=rPoUj3XD-fVXyfqQvohfn5FX=_21hOgGqeEg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 08:49:55 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Build regressions/improvements in v6.6-rc1
Hi Randy,
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 1:08 AM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
> On 9/11/23 01:38, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > 4 warning regressions:
> []
> > + modpost: WARNING: modpost: vmlinux: section mismatch in reference: ioremap_prot+0x88 (section: .text) -> ioremap_fixed (section: .init.text): => N/A
>
> I would consider trying to fix this one but I can't fathom trying to search thru 237 build logs with a web browser
> to find which arch/config it is.
>
> I did start on that but I'm giving up.
>
> If possible, please add the arch/config info to the Build regressions/improvements reports
> in the future.
I always reply with more details after my analysis (which is a manual
process). Unfortunately, due to hick-ups with vger and lore, none of
the emails I sent out yesterday using git-send-email made it to the
lists before last night, so I didn't have anything to reply to until
this morning...
Today, the email issues seem to have been fixed (although I still
haven't received the report myself, but at least lore now has it),
so the analysis is there.
And FTR, I sent out a fix for the section mismatch yesterday, and
Andrew has already picked it up.
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists