linux-kernel - Re: Build regressions/improvements in v6.6-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <60faf0a3-a65c-ff83-6ecd-fe99ce9660f3@infradead.org>
Date:   Tue, 12 Sep 2023 00:33:13 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Build regressions/improvements in v6.6-rc1



On 9/11/23 23:49, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Randy,
> 
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 1:08 AM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
>> On 9/11/23 01:38, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> 4 warning regressions:
>> []
>>>   + modpost: WARNING: modpost: vmlinux: section mismatch in reference: ioremap_prot+0x88 (section: .text) -> ioremap_fixed (section: .init.text):  => N/A
>>
>> I would consider trying to fix this one but I can't fathom trying to search thru 237 build logs with a web browser
>> to find which arch/config it is.
>>
>> I did start on that but I'm giving up.
>>
>> If possible, please add the arch/config info to the Build regressions/improvements reports
>> in the future.
> 
> I always reply with more details after my analysis (which is a manual
> process).  Unfortunately, due to hick-ups with vger and lore, none of
> the emails I sent out yesterday using git-send-email made it to the
> lists before last night, so I didn't have anything to reply to until
> this morning...

yep.

> Today, the email issues seem to have been fixed (although I still
> haven't received the report myself, but at least lore now has it),
> so the analysis is there.

I see it. Thanks.

> And FTR, I sent out a fix for the section mismatch yesterday, and
> Andrew has already picked it up.

:)

-- 
~Randy