linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 01/10] gpio: pca953x: Drop unused fields in struct pca953x_platform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 12 Sep 2023 12:31:31 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 01/10] gpio: pca953x: Drop unused fields in struct
 pca953x_platform_data

On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 09:50:06AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 3:40 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > New code should solely use firmware nodes for the specifics and
> > not any callbacks.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> Patches look good to me:
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> for all patches.

Thank you!

> Patch 8 looks HTML on my gmail but I guess the problem
> is on my side.

The entire series has been sent in the same way, it's quite unlikely that
the only patch got mangled while others are okay.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko