linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 01/10] gpio: pca953x: Drop unused fields in struct pca953x_platform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMRc=MdgNxt4wobVLU5kqcnyW6J-=bMRLBk5cAmaEmucV-t0Pw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 12 Sep 2023 11:48:27 +0200
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 01/10] gpio: pca953x: Drop unused fields in struct pca953x_platform_data

On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 11:31 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 09:50:06AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 3:40 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > New code should solely use firmware nodes for the specifics and
> > > not any callbacks.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> >
> > Patches look good to me:
> > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> > for all patches.
>
> Thank you!
>
> > Patch 8 looks HTML on my gmail but I guess the problem
> > is on my side.
>
> The entire series has been sent in the same way, it's quite unlikely that
> the only patch got mangled while others are okay.
>

I'm using cmdg - a command-line interface to gmail - and all patches
look fine. Surprisingly, the web interface indeed does mangle patch 8
for some reason.

Bart