[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9ea1b028-8ac7-61b0-90e2-d240d52aaffb@embeddedor.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 16:32:05 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>,
Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
Cc: Gustavo Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] checkpatch: Add a couple new alloc functions to alloc
with multiplies check
On 9/13/23 16:25, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-09-13 at 16:14 -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>>
>> On 9/13/23 14:37, Joe Perches wrote:
>>> vmalloc() and vzalloc() functions have now 2-factor multiplication
>>> argument forms vmalloc_array() and vcalloc(), correspondingly.
>>>
>>> Add alloc-with-multiplies checks for these new functions.
>>>
>>> Simplify the original codes repeated else to use a hash.
>>>
>>> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/342
>>>
>>> Original-patch-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
>>
>> Why don't you wait for a response or a v2 from the original
>> submitter?
>
> Because there really is no need to wait.
By the way, did you test it?
--
Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists