[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7a9f7631b7352d7f9ce07bdc53cfc92065cb11a3.camel@perches.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 15:34:42 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>,
Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
Cc: Gustavo Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] checkpatch: Add a couple new alloc functions to
alloc with multiplies check
On Wed, 2023-09-13 at 16:32 -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>
> On 9/13/23 16:25, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Wed, 2023-09-13 at 16:14 -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > >
> > > On 9/13/23 14:37, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > vmalloc() and vzalloc() functions have now 2-factor multiplication
> > > > argument forms vmalloc_array() and vcalloc(), correspondingly.
> > > >
> > > > Add alloc-with-multiplies checks for these new functions.
> > > >
> > > > Simplify the original codes repeated else to use a hash.
> > > >
> > > > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/342
> > > >
> > > > Original-patch-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
> > >
> > > Why don't you wait for a response or a v2 from the original
> > > submitter?
> >
> > Because there really is no need to wait.
>
> By the way, did you test it?
Yes, against arch/s390/include/asm/idals.h
Did you? If so, you could also add your own tested-by...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists