linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dwc: Add Single DMA mode support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <644e3564-994d-0b51-7d58-dac6afc1e0ec@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 13 Sep 2023 08:38:55 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Myunguk Kim <mwkim@...nchips.com>
Cc:     alsa-devel@...a-project.org, broonie@...nel.org,
        conor+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, fido_max@...ox.ru,
        joabreu@...opsys.com, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com, lgirdwood@...il.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, perex@...ex.cz, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        tiwai@...e.com, u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de,
        xingyu.wu@...rfivetech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dwc: Add Single DMA mode support

On 13/09/2023 04:53, Myunguk Kim wrote:
>> Bindings are always separate patch.
> 
> Okay, I will send v2.
> 
>> This was not tested. Missing vendor prefix, type.
>>
>> Anyway please provide some explanation why this cannot be deduced from
>> the compatible.
> 
> This is not dependent on a specific vendor, 
> but is intended to describe 
> the properties of the signal(single/burst request) connection 
> relationship between i2s and dma.

How does this relationship depend on hardware?

Best regards,
Krzysztof