[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=MdK9637mtuE=4fdMCWtNx6=oZcm6KfEyTZfktceDisENw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 14:14:22 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH 1/3] gpio: eic-sprd: unregister from the irq notifier
on remove()
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 1:02 PM Baolin Wang
<baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 9/12/2023 5:45 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
> >
> > This is a tristate module, it can be unloaded. We need to cleanup properly
> > and unregister from the interrupt notifier on driver detach.
> >
> > Fixes: b32415652a4d ("gpio: eic-sprd: use atomic notifiers to notify all chips about irqs")
> > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
>
> LGTM.
> Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
>
Thanks, queued patches 1 and 2.
Bart
> > ---
> > drivers/gpio/gpio-eic-sprd.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-eic-sprd.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-eic-sprd.c
> > index 21a1afe358d6..9b2f9ccf8d77 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-eic-sprd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-eic-sprd.c
> > @@ -580,6 +580,14 @@ static const struct irq_chip sprd_eic_irq = {
> > .flags = IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE | IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE,
> > GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPERS,
> > };
> > +
> > +static void sprd_eic_unregister_notifier(void *data)
> > +{
> > + struct notifier_block *nb = data;
> > +
> > + atomic_notifier_chain_unregister(&sprd_eic_irq_notifier, nb);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int sprd_eic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > const struct sprd_eic_variant_data *pdata;
> > @@ -658,8 +666,15 @@ static int sprd_eic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > }
> >
> > sprd_eic->irq_nb.notifier_call = sprd_eic_irq_notify;
> > - return atomic_notifier_chain_register(&sprd_eic_irq_notifier,
> > - &sprd_eic->irq_nb);
> > + ret = atomic_notifier_chain_register(&sprd_eic_irq_notifier,
> > + &sprd_eic->irq_nb);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret,
> > + "Failed to register with the interrupt notifier");
> > +
> > + return devm_add_action_or_reset(&pdev->dev,
> > + sprd_eic_unregister_notifier,
> > + &sprd_eic->irq_nb);
> > }
> >
> > static const struct of_device_id sprd_eic_of_match[] = {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists