lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 14 Sep 2023 10:02:03 +0800 (CST)
From:   <yang.yang29@....com.cn>
To:     <surenb@...gle.com>
Cc:     <hannes@...xchg.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] sched/psi: Avoid update triggers and rtpoll_total when it is unnecessary

>  I don't think that's your intention here, it is?
It's an omission, rtpoll_next_update should be update, thanks
for your reviewing. I did a simple test and did not see delay,
maybe it is other reason.

And I read update_triggers() again, it always return 
now + group->rtpoll_min_period, and this return
value is only used by psi_rtpoll_work(). So I think
there is no need for update_triggers() to return
value. So what about this version see below:

---
 kernel/sched/psi.c | 11 +++++------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/psi.c b/kernel/sched/psi.c
index 81fca77397f6..b6b8af2cf311 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/psi.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/psi.c
@@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ static u64 window_update(struct psi_window *win, u64 now, u64 value)
 	return growth;
 }

-static u64 update_triggers(struct psi_group *group, u64 now, bool *update_total,
+static void update_triggers(struct psi_group *group, u64 now, bool *update_total,
 						   enum psi_aggregators aggregator)
 {
 	struct psi_trigger *t;
@@ -499,8 +499,6 @@ static u64 update_triggers(struct psi_group *group, u64 now, bool *update_total,
 		/* Reset threshold breach flag once event got generated */
 		t->pending_event = false;
 	}
-
-	return now + group->rtpoll_min_period;
 }

 static u64 update_averages(struct psi_group *group, u64 now)
@@ -699,10 +697,11 @@ static void psi_rtpoll_work(struct psi_group *group)
 	if (now > group->rtpoll_until) {
 		group->rtpoll_next_update = ULLONG_MAX;
 		goto out;
-	}
+	} else
+		group->rtpoll_next_update = now + group->rtpoll_min_period;

-	if (now >= group->rtpoll_next_update) {
-		group->rtpoll_next_update = update_triggers(group, now, &update_total, PSI_POLL);
+	if ((changed_states & group->rtpoll_states) && (now >= group->rtpoll_next_update)) {
+		update_triggers(group, now, &update_total, PSI_POLL);
 		if (update_total)
 			memcpy(group->rtpoll_total, group->total[PSI_POLL],
 				   sizeof(group->rtpoll_total));
-- 
2.25.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ