[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <82dfa2eb-1867-4cdc-b7b8-918d426575ed@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 07:05:31 +0200
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Nicolas Schier" <nicolas@...sle.eu>
Cc: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...nel.org>,
"Masahiro Yamada" <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@....net>,
"Sakari Ailus" <sakari.ailus@....fi>,
"Javier Martinez Canillas" <javierm@...hat.com>,
"Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@...nel.org>,
"Nick Desaulniers" <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: kbuild: explain handling optional dependencies
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023, at 05:51, Nicolas Schier wrote:
> On Wed 13 Sep 2023 23:16:47 GMT, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2023, at 22:34, Nicolas Schier wrote:
>> >
>> > BAR=y => FOO={N/m/y}
>> > BAR=m => FOO is not selectable
>> > BAR=n => FOO={N/m/y}
>>
>> That is indeed the point: if BAR=m, we want to be able to pick FOO=m
>> here, otherwise it is impossible to enabled everything as modules.
>
> oh, I misinterpreted your very first sentence; thanks for clarifying it to me
> and sorry for the noise.
> With the minor fixes:
>
> Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>
>
Ok, thanks!
I understand that the text is still confusing, so if anyone has an
idea for how to improve it further, let me know, otherwise
I'll send what I have now with type fixes as v2.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists