linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Documentation: kbuild: explain handling optional dependencies

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <874jjx1k7v.fsf@minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set>
Date:   Thu, 14 Sep 2023 05:56:20 +0200
From:   Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: kbuild: explain handling optional
 dependencies

"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de> writes:

Hello Nicolas,

> On Wed, Sep 13, 2023, at 22:34, Nicolas Schier wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 09:55:36PM +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>

[...]

>> I can choose between:
>>
>> BAR=y  => FOO={N/m/y}
>> BAR=m  => FOO is not selectable
>> BAR=n  => FOO={N/m/y}
>
> That is indeed the point: if BAR=m, we want to be able to pick FOO=m
> here, otherwise it is impossible to enabled everything as modules.
>
> Another correct way to express the same thing as the first would
> be 
>
> config FOO
>       tristate "Support for foo hardware"
>       depends on !BAR=m || m
>
> which I find even more confusing than the 'BAR || !BAR'
> convention, though we have that in a couple of places.
>
> I just found another variant that I had not seen before:
>
>> (Re-checked with BAR=IPV6 and FOO=WIREGUARD; CONFIG_WIREGUARD as 'depends on
>> IPV6 || !IPV6' in its kconfig definition, and both are tristate kconfig
>> symbols.)
>>

Which is correct because WIREGUARD can be built with IPV6 disabled, but
if both options are enabled then WIREGUARD can only be built-in if the
IPV6 option is also built-in.

WIREGUARD must be a module if IPV6 is also a module, but can still be a
module if IPV6 is built-in.

In other words, what this idiom express is that the following configs
are possible:

 IPV6=n => WIREGUARD=y
 IPV6=n => WIREGUARD=m
 IPV6=y => WIREGUARD=y
 IPV6=y => WIREGUARD=m
 IPV6=m => WIREGUARD=m

but the following option is not possible:

 IPV6=m => WIREGUARD=y

-- 
Best regards,

Javier Martinez Canillas
Core Platforms
Red Hat