[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=MfnPdr66OPSkkjjpZY2VY7wN4WO2uBPbpyExFH0F6e=1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 11:30:02 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Harvey Hunt <harveyhuntnexus@...il.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] mtd: rawnand: ingenic: use gpiod_set_active_high()
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 10:30 AM Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Le jeudi 14 septembre 2023 à 10:02 +0300, Andy Shevchenko a écrit :
> > On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 11:23 PM Miquel Raynal
> > <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com> wrote:
> > > linus.walleij@...aro.org wrote on Wed, 13 Sep 2023 22:12:40 +0200:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 10:05 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > > > <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 2:50 PM Bartosz Golaszewski
> > > > > <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > > > Why not moving this quirk to gpiolib-of.c?
> > > >
> > > > That's a better idea here I think, it's clearly a quirk for a
> > > > buggy device tree.
> > >
> > > Agreed, it's just for backward compatibility purposes in a single
> > > driver. I believe it should stay here.
> >
> > I believe Linus was for moving.
>
> Which Linus? Because the one who's also the gpio maintainer just wrote
> above that it was better to keep it in the driver.
>
I'm also under the impression that Linus meant moving it to gpiolib-of.c. Let's
Linus: Could you clarify?
Bart
> Cheers,
> -Paul
>
> >
> > gpiolib-of.c contains a lot of quirks, including this one. Calling
> > these new (or old) APIs for overriding polarity in many cases
> > shouldn't be needed if were no issues with DT or something like that.
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists