[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87pm2kap1p.fsf@all.your.base.are.belong.to.us>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 14:59:30 +0200
From: Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, Andy Chiu <andy.chiu@...ive.com>,
Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@...ive.com>,
"Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
Samuel Neves <sneves@....uc.pt>,
Björn Töpel
<bjorn@...osinc.com>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] RISC-V BLAKE2s Vector implementation
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 01:57:22PM +0200, Björn Töpel wrote:
>> From: Björn Töpel <bjorn@...osinc.com>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is Andy's kernel mode vector V2 series [1], with my BLAKE2s
>> AVX-512-to-RISC-V translation patch appended.
>>
>> I've tagged it as RFC, since Andy's series is still not in-tree yet.
>>
>> It's a first step towards a Vector aided Wireguard! ;-)
>
> This has the same problems as Andy's stuff & doesn't build properly for the
> automation. What is the plan between yourself and Andy for submitting a
> version of the in-kernel vector support that passes build testing?
I'll synch up with Andy! I'm not even sure the blake2s patch should part
of the "in-kernel vector" series at all.
Thanks,
Björn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists