[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2ce1374c-c400-17c1-767d-dcc010b3be08@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 14:39:41 +0100
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
To: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Cc: syzbot <syzbot+a36975231499dc24df44@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
axboe@...nel.dk, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [io-uring?] KCSAN: data-race in
io_wq_activate_free_worker / io_wq_worker_running
On 9/14/23 14:25, Marco Elver wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Sept 2023 at 15:11, Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 9/13/23 14:07, Marco Elver wrote:
>>> On Wed, 13 Sept 2023 at 14:13, Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 9/13/23 12:29, syzbot wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> syzbot found the following issue on:
>>>>>
>>>>> HEAD commit: f97e18a3f2fb Merge tag 'gpio-updates-for-v6.6' of git://gi..
>>>>> git tree: upstream
>>>>> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=12864667a80000
>>>>> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=fe440f256d065d3b
>>>>> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=a36975231499dc24df44
>>>>> compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
>>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
>>>>>
>>>>> Downloadable assets:
>>>>> disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/b1781aaff038/disk-f97e18a3.raw.xz
>>>>> vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/5b915468fd6d/vmlinux-f97e18a3.xz
>>>>> kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/abc8ece931f3/bzImage-f97e18a3.xz
>>>>>
>>>>> IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
>>>>> Reported-by: syzbot+a36975231499dc24df44@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> ==================================================================
>>>>> BUG: KCSAN: data-race in io_wq_activate_free_worker / io_wq_worker_running
>>>>>
>>>>> write to 0xffff888127f736c4 of 4 bytes by task 4731 on cpu 1:
>>>>> io_wq_worker_running+0x64/0xa0 io_uring/io-wq.c:668
>>>>> schedule_timeout+0xcc/0x230 kernel/time/timer.c:2167
>>>>> io_wq_worker+0x4b2/0x840 io_uring/io-wq.c:633
>>>>> ret_from_fork+0x2e/0x40 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:145
>>>>> ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304
>>>>>
>>>>> read to 0xffff888127f736c4 of 4 bytes by task 4719 on cpu 0:
>>>>> io_wq_get_acct io_uring/io-wq.c:168 [inline]
>>>>> io_wq_activate_free_worker+0xfa/0x280 io_uring/io-wq.c:267
>>>>> io_wq_enqueue+0x262/0x450 io_uring/io-wq.c:914
>>>>
>>>> 1) the worst case scenario we'll choose a wrong type of
>>>> worker, which is inconsequential.
>>>>
>>>> 2) we're changing the IO_WORKER_F_RUNNING bit, but checking
>>>> for IO_WORKER_F_BOUND. The latter one is set at the very
>>>> beginning, it would require compiler to be super inventive
>>>> to actually hit the problem.
>>>>
>>>> I don't believe it's a problem, but it'll nice to attribute
>>>> it properly, READ_ONCE?, or split IO_WORKER_F_BOUND out into
>>>> a separate field.
>>>
>>> It's a simple bit flag set & read, I'd go for READ_ONCE() (and
>>> WRITE_ONCE() - but up to you, these bitflag sets & reads have been ok
>>> with just the READ_ONCE(), and KCSAN currently doesn't care if there's
>>> a WRITE_ONCE() or not).
>>>
>>>> value changed: 0x0000000d -> 0x0000000b
>>>
>>> This is interesting though - it says that it observed 2 bits being
>>> flipped. We don't see where IO_WORKER_F_FREE was unset though.
>>
>> __io_worker_busy() clears it, should be it. I assume syz just
>> missed another false data race with this one. After init only
>> the worker thread should be changing the flags AFAIR
>
> The data races reported are very real, i.e. it only reports if it
> actually observes _real_ concurrency. I guess the question is if these
That's what I'm saying, I assume that syz is not completely
analytical and triggering a race is subject to execution
randomness, and races with IO_WORKER_F_FREE are harder to hit
for syzkaller.
> are benign or not. If benign, you can choose to annotate with
Yes, it is, just like the one in the report
> READ/WRITE_ONCE [1], data_race, or leave as is (ignoring this report
> should not make it re-report any time soon).
>
> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/tools/memory-model/Documentation/access-marking.txt
--
Pavel Begunkov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists