linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 08/15] x86/boot: Drop references to startup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZQR8FptFJ+8Ht7Y3@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 Sep 2023 17:45:26 +0200
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc:     Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...gle.com>, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Evgeniy Baskov <baskov@...ras.ru>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>,
        Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
        Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/15] x86/boot: Drop references to startup_64


* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:

> Very weird - could it have gotten lost in the sending process, on your 
> side?

In any case I've dropped patch #8 from tip:x86/boot as well - the first 6 
patches arrived fine and are in the intended order.

Once the boot problem has been resolved, mind resending the rest?

There are no changes in -tip that should be interfering: tip:x86/boot has 
an upstream base.

Thanks,

	Ingo