linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 08/15] x86/boot: Drop references to startup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMj1kXEmEfngtuyEkYuzgif14E-338z1XNdRpGizK8TvywGX6g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 Sep 2023 17:48:05 +0200
From:   Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:     Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...gle.com>, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Evgeniy Baskov <baskov@...ras.ru>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>,
        Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
        Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/15] x86/boot: Drop references to startup_64

On Fri, 15 Sept 2023 at 17:45, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > Very weird - could it have gotten lost in the sending process, on your
> > side?
>


Lore does have them but I have no idea whose end caused this - I
recently switched to Google's internal infrastructure for outgoing GIT
email as our network does not permit outgoing SMTP to kernel.org but
this is the first time I heard of a potential issue of this nature.

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-efi/20230912090051.4014114-24-ardb@google.com/T/#u
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-efi/20230912090051.4014114-26-ardb@google.com/T/#u


> In any case I've dropped patch #8 from tip:x86/boot as well - the first 6
> patches arrived fine and are in the intended order.
>
> Once the boot problem has been resolved, mind resending the rest?
>
> There are no changes in -tip that should be interfering: tip:x86/boot has
> an upstream base.
>

Yeah I'll respin and resend. Thanks.