lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 15 Sep 2023 10:12:53 -0700
From:   "Joseph, Jithu" <jithu.joseph@...el.com>
To:     Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
CC:     <hdegoede@...hat.com>, <markgross@...nel.org>,
        <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <bp@...en8.de>,
        <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <x86@...nel.org>, <hpa@...or.com>,
        <rostedt@...dmis.org>, <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
        <tony.luck@...el.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>, <patches@...ts.linux.dev>,
        <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>, <pengfei.xu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] platform/x86/intel/ifs: Store IFS generation number

Appreciate the review

On 9/15/2023 9:22 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2023, Jithu Joseph wrote:
> 
>> IFS generation number is reported via MSR_INTEGRITY_CAPS.
> 
> Please use more characters per line, the limit is 72 characters.
> 

Noted
...


>> +#define MSR_INTEGRITY_CAPS_SAF_GEN_REV_SHIFT	9
>> +#define MSR_INTEGRITY_CAPS_SAF_GEN_REV_MASK	(0x3ull << MSR_INTEGRITY_CAPS_SAF_GEN_REV_SHIFT)
> 
> GENMASK_ULL(), don't add _SHIFT at all as FIELD_GET/PREP() will handle 
> it for you.

Thanks, Will change
...

>>  struct ifs_work {
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/core.c
>> index 306f886b52d2..88d84aad9334 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/ifs/core.c
>> @@ -94,6 +94,8 @@ static int __init ifs_init(void)
>>  	for (i = 0; i < IFS_NUMTESTS; i++) {
>>  		if (!(msrval & BIT(ifs_devices[i].test_caps->integrity_cap_bit)))
>>  			continue;
>> +		ifs_devices[i].rw_data.generation = (msrval & MSR_INTEGRITY_CAPS_SAF_GEN_REV_MASK)
>> +							>> MSR_INTEGRITY_CAPS_SAF_GEN_REV_SHIFT;
> 
> FIELD_GET(), don't forget to make sure use have the include for it.

Will change


Jithu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ