linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: Fix some build warnings with -W1 option

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <72f7104b8097d5f894f069528a0e1a2b0f7e210d.camel@xry111.site>
Date:   Sat, 16 Sep 2023 18:20:27 +0800
From:   Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>
To:     bibo mao <maobibo@...ngson.cn>, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
Cc:     loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: Fix some build warnings with -W1 option

On Sat, 2023-09-16 at 18:17 +0800, bibo mao wrote:
> > What is a -W1 option?  At least GCC 13 does not recognize it.
> > 
> > And generally you cannot randomly add warning options building the
> > kernel and expect a clean result.  I don't think we should "fix"
> > breakages caused by custom warnings at all, unless the warning indicates
> > a real issue.
> it is W=1 option:), and it is reported by lkp tool like this:

Get it, then the subject should just say "W=1" instead of "-W1".

-- 
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University