linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] LoongArch: Add missing headers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZQWCeI6E7rm8Akbt@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Sat, 16 Sep 2023 13:24:56 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
Cc:     loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] LoongArch: Add missing headers

On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 08:36:24AM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 2:53 AM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 11:25:22PM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:

> > > Thank you for your patch, can this patch solve the problem below?
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309072237.9zxMv4MZ-lkp@intel.com/T/#u
> >
> > Nope, this just adds missing includes.
> > No functional change, so warnings will still be there.
> But I think a patch should solve a problem.

No, that problem is static analyser concern, not the compiler nor linker.

> If we don't get a build
> error or warning without this patch, does that mean the 'missing'
> headers are actually included indirectly?

I might be missing something, but I do not see any build error in the above message.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko