[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAhV-H6dakVH0a4Mt9MdcY8OO3gdne6rW0Z1kK6YRq9hDLP05w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2023 20:05:52 +0800
From: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] LoongArch: Add missing headers
On Sat, Sep 16, 2023 at 6:27 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 08:36:24AM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 2:53 AM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 11:25:22PM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
>
> > > > Thank you for your patch, can this patch solve the problem below?
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309072237.9zxMv4MZ-lkp@intel.com/T/#u
> > >
> > > Nope, this just adds missing includes.
> > > No functional change, so warnings will still be there.
> > But I think a patch should solve a problem.
>
> No, that problem is static analyser concern, not the compiler nor linker.
>
> > If we don't get a build
> > error or warning without this patch, does that mean the 'missing'
> > headers are actually included indirectly?
>
> I might be missing something, but I do not see any build error in the above message.
Hmm, then I think I will take the second patch only.
Huacai
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists