[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f855b3db-2754-5f66-9fc2-061a517814ef@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 13:16:16 -0700
From: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
CC: <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <robdclark@...il.com>,
<sean@...rly.run>, <swboyd@...omium.org>, <dianders@...omium.org>,
<vkoul@...nel.org>, <daniel@...ll.ch>, <airlied@...il.com>,
<agross@...nel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
<quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>, <quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com>,
<quic_sbillaka@...cinc.com>, <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
<freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] drm/msm/dp: use drm_bridge_hpd_notify() to report
HPD status changes
On 9/15/2023 5:41 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Sept 2023 at 00:38, Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com> wrote:
>> Currently DP driver use drm_helper_hpd_irq_event(), bypassing drm bridge
>> framework, to report HPD status changes to user space frame work.
>> Replace it with drm_bridge_hpd_notify() since DP driver is part of drm
>> bridge.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
>
> Also see the comment below.
>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c | 20 ++------------------
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
>> index 18d16c7..59f9d85 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
>> @@ -356,26 +356,10 @@ static bool dp_display_is_sink_count_zero(struct dp_display_private *dp)
>> (dp->link->sink_count == 0);
>> }
>>
>> -static void dp_display_send_hpd_event(struct msm_dp *dp_display)
>> -{
>> - struct dp_display_private *dp;
>> - struct drm_connector *connector;
>> -
>> - dp = container_of(dp_display, struct dp_display_private, dp_display);
>> -
>> - connector = dp->dp_display.connector;
>> - drm_helper_hpd_irq_event(connector->dev);
>> -}
>> -
>> static int dp_display_send_hpd_notification(struct dp_display_private *dp,
>> bool hpd)
>> {
>> - if ((hpd && dp->dp_display.link_ready) ||
>> - (!hpd && !dp->dp_display.link_ready)) {
>> - drm_dbg_dp(dp->drm_dev, "HPD already %s\n",
>> - (hpd ? "on" : "off"));
>> - return 0;
>> - }
>> + struct drm_bridge *bridge = dp->dp_display.bridge;
>>
>> /* reset video pattern flag on disconnect */
>> if (!hpd)
> Note, this part (resetting the video_test and setting of is_connected)
> should be moved to the dp_bridge_hpd_notify() too. Please ignore this
> comment if this is handled later in the series.
I think keep them here is better since eDP does not populate hpd_enable,
hpd_disable and hpd_notify at edp_bridge_ops at drm_bridge_attach().
Keep them here will work for both eDP and DP.
>
>
>> @@ -385,7 +369,7 @@ static int dp_display_send_hpd_notification(struct dp_display_private *dp,
>>
>> drm_dbg_dp(dp->drm_dev, "type=%d hpd=%d\n",
>> dp->dp_display.connector_type, hpd);
>> - dp_display_send_hpd_event(&dp->dp_display);
>> + drm_bridge_hpd_notify(bridge, dp->dp_display.link_ready);
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists