[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ttrrc2yl.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 02:14:58 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
Charles Han <hanchunchao@...pur.com>, djwong@...nel.org,
dchinner@...hat.com, allison.henderson@...cle.com,
bhelgaas@...gle.com
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] Documentation: xfs: Remove duplicate 'the' in
transaction sequence process
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 03:40:54PM +0800, Charles Han wrote:
>> Remove the repeated word "the" in comments.
>
> Patch title looks OK but in this case, the patch description should also match.
> Hint: there is no code comments in the doc below.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Charles Han <hanchunchao@...pur.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/filesystems/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst
>> index 1625d1131093..a0678101a7d0 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst
>> @@ -1585,7 +1585,7 @@ The transaction sequence looks like this:
>> 2. The second transaction contains a physical update to the free space btrees
>> of AG 3 to release the former BMBT block and a second physical update to the
>> free space btrees of AG 7 to release the unmapped file space.
>> - Observe that the the physical updates are resequenced in the correct order
>> + Observe that the physical updates are resequenced in the correct order
>> when possible.
>> Attached to the transaction is a an extent free done (EFD) log item.
>> The EFD contains a pointer to the EFI logged in transaction #1 so that log
>
> Regardless, wait for one or few days before rerolling this patch with
> reviews addressed. It allows other reviewers to catch up and review. You can
> also Cc: me if you'd like.
Bagas, this is a patch removing an extra "the". We do not need to make
life this hard for such a simple fix.
Charles, the patch is good enough, no need for a third version.
(Next time, though, do wait before resubmitting a patch. When you do,
put a description of what changed below the "---" line.)
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists