[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZQgTP8uQUNAnBmX9@debian.me>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 16:07:11 +0700
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Charles Han <hanchunchao@...pur.com>, djwong@...nel.org,
dchinner@...hat.com, allison.henderson@...cle.com,
bhelgaas@...gle.com
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] Documentation: xfs: Remove duplicate 'the' in
transaction sequence process
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 02:14:58AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 03:40:54PM +0800, Charles Han wrote:
> >> Remove the repeated word "the" in comments.
> >
> > Patch title looks OK but in this case, the patch description should also match.
> > Hint: there is no code comments in the doc below.
> >
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Charles Han <hanchunchao@...pur.com>
> >> ---
> >> Documentation/filesystems/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst | 2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst
> >> index 1625d1131093..a0678101a7d0 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst
> >> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst
> >> @@ -1585,7 +1585,7 @@ The transaction sequence looks like this:
> >> 2. The second transaction contains a physical update to the free space btrees
> >> of AG 3 to release the former BMBT block and a second physical update to the
> >> free space btrees of AG 7 to release the unmapped file space.
> >> - Observe that the the physical updates are resequenced in the correct order
> >> + Observe that the physical updates are resequenced in the correct order
> >> when possible.
> >> Attached to the transaction is a an extent free done (EFD) log item.
> >> The EFD contains a pointer to the EFI logged in transaction #1 so that log
> >
> > Regardless, wait for one or few days before rerolling this patch with
> > reviews addressed. It allows other reviewers to catch up and review. You can
> > also Cc: me if you'd like.
>
> Bagas, this is a patch removing an extra "the". We do not need to make
> life this hard for such a simple fix.
>
> Charles, the patch is good enough, no need for a third version.
>
> (Next time, though, do wait before resubmitting a patch. When you do,
> put a description of what changed below the "---" line.)
Thanks for the reminder!
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists