lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b67c7c31-9d20-4e62-adf6-0ab0c678bed2@opensource.cirrus.com>
Date:   Mon, 18 Sep 2023 10:40:49 +0100
From:   Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>
To:     Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@...el.com>, <rafael@...nel.org>,
        <len.brown@...el.com>, <pavel@....cz>,
        <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, <paul@...pouillou.net>,
        <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, <lars@...afoo.de>,
        <rmfrfs@...il.com>, <jean-baptiste.maneyrol@....com>,
        <lee@...nel.org>, <laurentiu.palcu@....nxp.com>,
        <l.stach@...gutronix.de>, <james.schulman@...rus.com>,
        <david.rhodes@...rus.com>
CC:     <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        <patches@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
        <mallikarjunappa.sangannavar@...el.com>, <bala.senthil@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next v2 03/10] iio: accel: fxls8962af: convert to
 EXPORT_NS_GPL_RUNTIME_PM_OPS()

On 18/9/23 09:09, Raag Jadav wrote:
> With original macro being renamed to EXPORT_NS_GPL_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(),
> use the new macro.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@...el.com>
> ---
>   drivers/iio/accel/fxls8962af-core.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/fxls8962af-core.c b/drivers/iio/accel/fxls8962af-core.c
> index be8a15cb945f..69e73c54047e 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/fxls8962af-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/fxls8962af-core.c
> @@ -1282,7 +1282,7 @@ static int fxls8962af_resume(struct device *dev)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> -EXPORT_NS_GPL_DEV_PM_OPS(fxls8962af_pm_ops, IIO_FXLS8962AF) = {
> +EXPORT_NS_GPL_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(fxls8962af_pm_ops, IIO_FXLS8962AF) = {
>   	SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(fxls8962af_suspend, fxls8962af_resume)
>   	RUNTIME_PM_OPS(fxls8962af_runtime_suspend, fxls8962af_runtime_resume, NULL)
>   };
This change doesn't make sense. It changes the struct definition to use
a EXPORT_*_RUNTIME_PM_OPS() macro, which leads me to expect this is
exporting runtime pm ops. But then the struct has both SYSTEM and
RUNTIME functions.

Maybe the underlying implementations of the macros result in "doing the
right thing", but the source reads like it must be a mistake.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ