lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 18 Sep 2023 14:25:50 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Jagath Jog J <jagathjog1996@...il.com>, jic23@...nel.org,
        andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, lars@...afoo.de,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org
Cc:     linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: imu: Add DT binding doc for BMI323

On 18/09/2023 10:03, Jagath Jog J wrote:
> Add devicetree description document for Bosch BMI323, a 6-Axis IMU.

I don't know why this is RFC and cover letter does not explain it. Shall
I just ignore it? Patch is no ready? Recently at least two times someone
was disappointed that his code marked as RFC received my review.

A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "DT binding doc for". The
"dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings. Four
words entirely redundant and duplicating what prefix is saying...


> 
> Signed-off-by: Jagath Jog J <jagathjog1996@...il.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/iio/imu/bosch,bmi323.yaml        | 81 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 81 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/imu/bosch,bmi323.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/imu/bosch,bmi323.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/imu/bosch,bmi323.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..9c08988103c5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/imu/bosch,bmi323.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/iio/imu/bosch,bmi323.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Bosch BMI323 6-Axis IMU
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Jagath Jog J <jagathjog1996@...il.com>
> +
> +description:
> +  BMI323 is a 6-axis inertial measurement unit that supports acceleration and
> +  gyroscopic measurements with hardware fifo buffering. Sensor also provides
> +  events information such as motion, steps, orientation, single and double
> +  tap detection.
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    const: bosch,bmi323
> +
> +  reg:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  interrupts:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  interrupt-names:
> +    enum:
> +      - INT1
> +      - INT2
> +    description: |

Do not need '|' unless you need to preserve formatting.

> +      set to "INT1" if INT1 pin should be used as interrupt input, set
> +      to "INT2" if INT2 pin should be used instead

And what happens with other INT pin? Remains floating?

> +
> +  drive-open-drain:
> +    description: |

Do not need '|' unless you need to preserve formatting.

> +      set if the specified interrupt pin should be configured as
> +      open drain. If not set, defaults to push-pull.

Missing supplies. Are you sure device does not use any electric energy?

> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - reg
> +
> +allOf:
> +  - $ref: /schemas/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml#
> +
> +unevaluatedProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    // Example for I2C
> +    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> +    i2c {
> +        #address-cells = <1>;
> +        #size-cells = <0>;
> +> +        bmi323@68 {

Node names should be generic. See also an explanation and list of
examples (not exhaustive) in DT specification:
https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-devicetree-basics.html#generic-names-recommendation

> +            compatible = "bosch,bmi323";
> +            reg = <0x68>;
> +            interrupt-parent = <&gpio1>;
> +            interrupts = <29 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> +            interrupt-names = "INT1";
> +        };
> +    };
> +  - |
> +    // Example for SPI
> +    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> +    spi {


It's the same as other example. No difference. Drop.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ