[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM+2Eu+R6M7U+t4z5K0Cty736ybAzis7xnrT1edk4-y6B=JAOA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 22:14:40 +0530
From: Jagath Jog J <jagathjog1996@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: jic23@...nel.org, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
lars@...afoo.de, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: imu: Add DT binding doc for BMI323
Hi Krzysztof,
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 5:55 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 18/09/2023 10:03, Jagath Jog J wrote:
> > Add devicetree description document for Bosch BMI323, a 6-Axis IMU.
>
> I don't know why this is RFC and cover letter does not explain it. Shall
> I just ignore it? Patch is no ready? Recently at least two times someone
> was disappointed that his code marked as RFC received my review.
Thank you for reviewing. This was the sensor's first patch series,
so I initially submitted it as an RFC. I will mark it as "Patch"
in the next series.
>
> A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "DT binding doc for". The
> "dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings. Four
> words entirely redundant and duplicating what prefix is saying...
Sure I will remove redundant words from the subject line.
>
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jagath Jog J <jagathjog1996@...il.com>
> > ---
> > .../bindings/iio/imu/bosch,bmi323.yaml | 81 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/imu/bosch,bmi323.yaml
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/imu/bosch,bmi323.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/imu/bosch,bmi323.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..9c08988103c5
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/imu/bosch,bmi323.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/iio/imu/bosch,bmi323.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: Bosch BMI323 6-Axis IMU
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > + - Jagath Jog J <jagathjog1996@...il.com>
> > +
> > +description:
> > + BMI323 is a 6-axis inertial measurement unit that supports acceleration and
> > + gyroscopic measurements with hardware fifo buffering. Sensor also provides
> > + events information such as motion, steps, orientation, single and double
> > + tap detection.
> > +
> > +properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + const: bosch,bmi323
> > +
> > + reg:
> > + maxItems: 1
> > +
> > + interrupts:
> > + maxItems: 1
> > +
> > + interrupt-names:
> > + enum:
> > + - INT1
> > + - INT2
> > + description: |
>
> Do not need '|' unless you need to preserve formatting.
>
> > + set to "INT1" if INT1 pin should be used as interrupt input, set
> > + to "INT2" if INT2 pin should be used instead
>
> And what happens with other INT pin? Remains floating?`
Yes, the other pin is unconnected. The driver provides
support for either INT1, INT2, or no interrupt configuration.
I should have added minItems, maxItems, and const,
I will add these in the next series.
>
> > +
> > + drive-open-drain:
> > + description: |
>
> Do not need '|' unless you need to preserve formatting.
Sure I will remove this.
>
> > + set if the specified interrupt pin should be configured as
> > + open drain. If not set, defaults to push-pull.
>
> Missing supplies. Are you sure device does not use any electric energy?
Sorry, I missed adding supply, I will add it in the next series.
>
> > +
> > +required:
> > + - compatible
> > + - reg
> > +
> > +allOf:
> > + - $ref: /schemas/spi/spi-peripheral-props.yaml#
> > +
> > +unevaluatedProperties: false
> > +
> > +examples:
> > + - |
> > + // Example for I2C
> > + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> > + i2c {
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > +> + bmi323@68 {
>
> Node names should be generic. See also an explanation and list of
> examples (not exhaustive) in DT specification:
> https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-devicetree-basics.html#generic-names-recommendation
I intend to utilize the generic term 'imu' (representing the
accelerometer and gyrometer)
even though it's not listed in the generic-names recommendation.
Would this be acceptable?
>
> > + compatible = "bosch,bmi323";
> > + reg = <0x68>;
> > + interrupt-parent = <&gpio1>;
> > + interrupts = <29 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> > + interrupt-names = "INT1";
> > + };
> > + };
> > + - |
> > + // Example for SPI
> > + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> > + spi {
>
>
> It's the same as other example. No difference. Drop.
Sure I will keep only one example.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Regards,
Jagath
Powered by blists - more mailing lists