[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZQhu647Bo9gsldIF@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 18:38:19 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@...ebb.ca>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mark Pearson <markpearson@...ovo.com>,
Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] platform/x86: think-lmi: Use strreplace() to
replace a character by nul
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 04:48:40PM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On 13/09/2023 11.27, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > - p = strchrnul(value, ';');
> > - *p = '\0';
> > + strreplace(value, ';', '\0');
>
> So how do you know that the string contains at most one ';'? Same for
> all the other replacements. If that's not guaranteed, this is not at all
> equivalent.
>
> Or maybe the result is just used a normal string afterwards, and it
> doesn't matter at all how the content after the first ';' has been mangled?
>
> It's certainly not obvious to me that this is correct, but of course I
> know nothing about this code.
If you read the comment and code slightly above you may get that this is not
a problem at all. There are no side effects as the part after first occurrence
of ; is not used and original string is NUL-terminated.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists