[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eae67380-4eb5-b5b2-d010-ce1f80bc91f9@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 08:42:29 -0400
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
To: cy_huang@...htek.com, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Allen Lin <allen_lin@...htek.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ASoC: codecs: Add Richtek rtq9128audio amplifier
support
> +static int rtq9128_i2c_write(void *context, const void *data, size_t count)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = context;
> + struct i2c_client *i2c = to_i2c_client(dev);
> + u8 reg = *(u8 *)data;
> + int rg_size;
> +
> + BUG_ON(count != 5);
is this really necessary? Just log and error and return?
same comments for other functions
> + rg_size = rtq9128_get_reg_size(reg);
> + return i2c_smbus_write_i2c_block_data(i2c, reg, rg_size, data + count - rg_size);
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists