[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230920034319.GA4446@linuxcarl2.richtek.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 11:43:19 +0800
From: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@...htek.com>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Allen Lin <allen_lin@...htek.com>,
<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ASoC: codecs: Add Richtek rtq9128audio amplifier
support
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 08:42:29AM -0400, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>
> > +static int rtq9128_i2c_write(void *context, const void *data, size_t count)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev = context;
> > + struct i2c_client *i2c = to_i2c_client(dev);
> > + u8 reg = *(u8 *)data;
> > + int rg_size;
> > +
> > + BUG_ON(count != 5);
>
> is this really necessary? Just log and error and return?
> same comments for other functions
>
Yap, it can be removed. Originally, just use it to check regmap core really
follow the declared regmap config.
I think this check may still needed. I'll change the BUG_ON to if/err/return
following by your suggestion in v3.
> > + rg_size = rtq9128_get_reg_size(reg);
> > + return i2c_smbus_write_i2c_block_data(i2c, reg, rg_size, data + count - rg_size);
> > +}
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists