[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202309200813.1B0C125@keescook>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 08:13:28 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Azeem Shaikh <azeems@...gle.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vt: Replace strlcpy with strscpy
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 07:21:56PM +0000, Azeem Shaikh wrote:
> strlcpy() reads the entire source buffer first and returns the size of
> the source string, not the destination string, which can be accidentally
> misused [1].
>
> The copy_to_user() call uses @len returned from strlcpy() directly
> without checking its value. This could potentially lead to read
> overflow. There is no existing bug since @len is always guaranteed to be
> greater than hardcoded strings in @func_table[kb_func]. But as written
> it is very fragile and specifically uses a strlcpy() result without sanity
> checking and using it to copy to userspace.
>
> In an effort to remove strlcpy() completely [2], replace
> strlcpy() here with strscpy().
>
> [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#strlcpy
> [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/89
>
> Signed-off-by: Azeem Shaikh <azeems@...gle.com>
> ---
> v2:
> * Return -ENOSPC instead of -EFAULT in case of truncation.
> * Update commit log to clarify that there is no exploitable bug but instead the code uses a fragile anti-pattern.
Changes look good. Thanks!
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists