[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2c179d6e-7427-46a1-ae31-d0a48b0c2723@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 18:14:18 +0300
From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
Cc: vigneshr@...com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, srk@...com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: ti: Enable support for overlays for
relevant boards
On 20/09/2023 16:57, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 16:34-20230920, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> Enable __symbols__ in board DT files for which we expect
>> overlays to be supported.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile | 8 ++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile
>> index e7b8e2e7f083..06d6f264f292 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile
>> @@ -72,8 +72,16 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-am69-sk.dtb
>> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-j784s4-evm.dtb
>>
>> # Enable support for device-tree overlays
>> +DTC_FLAGS_k3-am625-beagleplay += -@
>> DTC_FLAGS_k3-am625-sk += -@
>> DTC_FLAGS_k3-am62-lp-sk += -@
>> +DTC_FLAGS_k3-am62a7-sk += -@
>> +DTC_FLAGS_k3-am642-evm += -@
>> +DTC_FLAGS_k3-am654-base-board += -@
>> DTC_FLAGS_k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced-m2 += -@
>> +DTC_FLAGS_k3-am68-sk-base-board += -@
>> +DTC_FLAGS_k3-am69-sk += -@
>> DTC_FLAGS_k3-j721e-common-proc-board += -@
>> +DTC_FLAGS_k3-j721e-sk += -@
>> DTC_FLAGS_k3-j721s2-common-proc-board += -@
>> +DTC_FLAGS_k3-j784s4-evm += -@
>
> is'nt it better to do it in context of the changes introduced?
>
Do you mean I should just add for the particular platform when
adding an overlay for that platform?
--
cheers,
-roger
Powered by blists - more mailing lists