lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 20 Sep 2023 18:14:18 +0300
From:   Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>
To:     Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
Cc:     vigneshr@...com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, srk@...com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: ti: Enable support for overlays for
 relevant boards



On 20/09/2023 16:57, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 16:34-20230920, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> Enable __symbols__ in board DT files for which we expect
>> overlays to be supported.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile | 8 ++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile
>> index e7b8e2e7f083..06d6f264f292 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile
>> @@ -72,8 +72,16 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-am69-sk.dtb
>>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-j784s4-evm.dtb
>>  
>>  # Enable support for device-tree overlays
>> +DTC_FLAGS_k3-am625-beagleplay += -@
>>  DTC_FLAGS_k3-am625-sk += -@
>>  DTC_FLAGS_k3-am62-lp-sk += -@
>> +DTC_FLAGS_k3-am62a7-sk += -@
>> +DTC_FLAGS_k3-am642-evm += -@
>> +DTC_FLAGS_k3-am654-base-board += -@
>>  DTC_FLAGS_k3-am6548-iot2050-advanced-m2 += -@
>> +DTC_FLAGS_k3-am68-sk-base-board += -@
>> +DTC_FLAGS_k3-am69-sk += -@
>>  DTC_FLAGS_k3-j721e-common-proc-board += -@
>> +DTC_FLAGS_k3-j721e-sk += -@
>>  DTC_FLAGS_k3-j721s2-common-proc-board += -@
>> +DTC_FLAGS_k3-j784s4-evm += -@
> 
> is'nt it better to do it in context of the changes introduced?
> 

Do you mean I should just add for the particular platform when
adding an overlay for that platform?

-- 
cheers,
-roger

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ