linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-mcu-wakeup: Add MCU domain ESM instance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 21 Sep 2023 16:29:11 +0530
From:   "Kumar, Udit" <u-kumar1@...com>
To:     Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@...com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <nm@...com>, <vigneshr@...com>, <kristo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e-mcu-wakeup: Add MCU domain
 ESM instance


On 9/20/2023 12:00 PM, Neha Malcom Francis wrote:
> Currently J721E defines only the main_esm in DTS. Add node for mcu_esm
> as well.
Could you please add some more description in commit message , why we 
need mcu_esm node.
> Signed-off-by: Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@...com>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-mcu-wakeup.dtsi | 7 +++++++
>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-mcu-wakeup.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-mcu-wakeup.dtsi
> index 05d6ef127ba7..fa8af20c7818 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-mcu-wakeup.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-mcu-wakeup.dtsi
> @@ -671,4 +671,11 @@ wkup_vtm0: temperature-sensor@...40000 {
>   		power-domains = <&k3_pds 154 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>;
>   		#thermal-sensor-cells = <1>;
>   	};
> +
> +	mcu_esm: esm@...00000 {
> +		compatible = "ti,j721e-esm";
> +		reg = <0x00 0x40800000 0x00 0x1000>;
> +		ti,esm-pins = <95>;
> +		bootph-pre-ram;
> +	};
>   };

With that change

Reviewed-by: Udit Kumar <u-kumar1@...com>