linux-kernel - [PATCH] drm/mipi-dsi: Fix detach call without attach

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230921-dsi-detach-fix-v1-1-d0de2d1621d9@ideasonboard.com>
Date:   Thu, 21 Sep 2023 13:50:32 +0300
From:   Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>
To:     "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>
Cc:     dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/mipi-dsi: Fix detach call without attach

It's been reported that DSI host driver's detach can be called without
the attach ever happening:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230412073954.20601-1-tony@atomide.com/

After reading the code, I think this is what happens:

We have a DSI host defined in the device tree and a DSI peripheral under
that host (i.e. an i2c device using the DSI as data bus doesn't exhibit
this behavior).

The host driver calls mipi_dsi_host_register(), which causes (via a few
functions) mipi_dsi_device_add() to be called for the DSI peripheral. So
now we have a DSI device under the host, but attach hasn't been called.

Normally the probing of the devices continues, and eventually the DSI
peripheral's driver will call mipi_dsi_attach(), attaching the
peripheral.

However, if the host driver's probe encounters an error after calling
mipi_dsi_host_register(), and before the peripheral has called
mipi_dsi_attach(), the host driver will do cleanups and return an error
from its probe function. The cleanups include calling
mipi_dsi_host_unregister().

mipi_dsi_host_unregister() will call two functions for all its DSI
peripheral devices: mipi_dsi_detach() and mipi_dsi_device_unregister().
The latter makes sense, as the device exists, but the former may be
wrong as attach has not necessarily been done.

To fix this, track the attached state of the peripheral, and only detach
from mipi_dsi_host_unregister() if the peripheral was attached.

Note that I have only tested this with a board with an i2c DSI
peripheral, not with a "pure" DSI peripheral.

However, slightly related, the unregister machinery still seems broken.
E.g. if the DSI host driver is unbound, it'll detach and unregister the
DSI peripherals. After that, when the DSI peripheral driver unbound
it'll call detach either directly or using the devm variant, leading to
a crash. And probably the driver will crash if it happens, for some
reason, to try to send a message via the DSI bus.

But that's another topic.

Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
 include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h     |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c
index 14201f73aab1..843a6dbda93a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c
@@ -347,7 +347,8 @@ static int mipi_dsi_remove_device_fn(struct device *dev, void *priv)
 {
 	struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = to_mipi_dsi_device(dev);
 
-	mipi_dsi_detach(dsi);
+	if (dsi->attached)
+		mipi_dsi_detach(dsi);
 	mipi_dsi_device_unregister(dsi);
 
 	return 0;
@@ -370,11 +371,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(mipi_dsi_host_unregister);
 int mipi_dsi_attach(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
 {
 	const struct mipi_dsi_host_ops *ops = dsi->host->ops;
+	int ret;
 
 	if (!ops || !ops->attach)
 		return -ENOSYS;
 
-	return ops->attach(dsi->host, dsi);
+	ret = ops->attach(dsi->host, dsi);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	dsi->attached = true;
+
+	return 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(mipi_dsi_attach);
 
@@ -386,9 +394,14 @@ int mipi_dsi_detach(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
 {
 	const struct mipi_dsi_host_ops *ops = dsi->host->ops;
 
+	if (WARN_ON(!dsi->attached))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	if (!ops || !ops->detach)
 		return -ENOSYS;
 
+	dsi->attached = false;
+
 	return ops->detach(dsi->host, dsi);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(mipi_dsi_detach);
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h b/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
index c9df0407980c..c0aec0d4d664 100644
--- a/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
+++ b/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
@@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ struct mipi_dsi_device_info {
  * struct mipi_dsi_device - DSI peripheral device
  * @host: DSI host for this peripheral
  * @dev: driver model device node for this peripheral
+ * @attached: the DSI device has been successfully attached
  * @name: DSI peripheral chip type
  * @channel: virtual channel assigned to the peripheral
  * @format: pixel format for video mode
@@ -184,6 +185,7 @@ struct mipi_dsi_device_info {
 struct mipi_dsi_device {
 	struct mipi_dsi_host *host;
 	struct device dev;
+	bool attached;
 
 	char name[DSI_DEV_NAME_SIZE];
 	unsigned int channel;

---
base-commit: 9fc75c40faa29df14ba16066be6bdfaea9f39ce4
change-id: 20230921-dsi-detach-fix-6736f7a48ba7

Best regards,
-- 
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>