[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230921113545.GR5285@atomide.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 14:35:45 +0300
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>
Cc: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/mipi-dsi: Fix detach call without attach
* Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com> [230921 10:51]:
> mipi_dsi_host_unregister() will call two functions for all its DSI
> peripheral devices: mipi_dsi_detach() and mipi_dsi_device_unregister().
> The latter makes sense, as the device exists, but the former may be
> wrong as attach has not necessarily been done.
>
> To fix this, track the attached state of the peripheral, and only detach
> from mipi_dsi_host_unregister() if the peripheral was attached.
>
> Note that I have only tested this with a board with an i2c DSI
> peripheral, not with a "pure" DSI peripheral.
Thanks this fixes the deferred probe warning I've been seeing:
Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists